failed Hailstrom initiative years ago. I wrote about Facebooks' Open Graph back in November. Its hard to not look at what they are doing in terms of wrapping the entire Web into a semantically structured environment all housed and operated with Facebook in the middle and think that this is a masterful job of "embrace and extend." VentureBeat does a nice job of summing up the major announcements with their round-up coverage here.
As a current application developer (check out Uno on Facebook) you can already see the advantage of Facebook, you get get access to massive scale -- our applications on Facebook already rival our reach in the US and soon the world thru our own operated and operated sites. This is staggering considering that we have been running casual games sites for 10 years. In a world where extensions of the FB platform are getting adopted extremely quickly (there are over 100 million users of FaceBook Connect), I wonder what this means for the contextual Web. Google is most certainly threatened by the idea of traffic share being subverted by URLs and domains on the OpenWeb that can (and will) be treated like suped-up Facebook Fan pages. Today, I already get more social networking traffic thru Twitter and Facebook versus SEO on this blog. So, when traffic is being driven by social search, what happens to how we think about driving traffic in the future? In fact, should I really be viewing Facebook as my posting environment versus Typepad? Think about how many businesses Facebook could elminiate or how many markets could they shrink?
SEO has was the rage for many years. A couple of years ago, you would have SEO snake-oil salesman coming into your company jabbering about their "science" while demanding huge consulting fees. But, I wonder if natural search traffic just wont matter that much in the coming years. Not only are the search engine providers moving into offensive mode by rolling out their own social efforts (e.g, Google Buzz), but, site owners will have to think thru what their offering should look like the future.Facebook is a open, walled-garden. The traffic techniques of the past are not gone by any means and I would argue that you will always want to own your own dirt (your own sites). But, its going to be harder to deploy the standard traffic techniques like link baiting that have been used successfully to drive customer traffic. Your search engine results page (SERP) could in fact become less important when your SEO traffic gets trumped by your SMO traffic.

Hi Matt,
I agree with Jason and don't think SEO is dead. People around the world are searching for information every day using Google. It is still a good practice to implement SEO strategies to capitalize on those target traffic or visitors.
Social media has also become more popular and is a great way for networking and marketing. Facebook and Twitter are no doubt two of the most popular social media platforms.
It will be great if you can integrate SEO (for search engines) and social media into your overall business strategy.
Posted by: Paul | September 18, 2011 at 01:07 AM
"As long as 'google' remains a verb, SEO will not die."
I agree. Facebook, despite the billions of page views it gets, has a PPC click business that is barely a shadow of Google's. Facebook has to find a way to transition itself into being a search platform instead of solely a social platform.
Posted by: smart goals | August 26, 2011 at 04:12 PM
my posting environment versus Typepad? Think about how many businesses Facebook could elminiate or how many markets could they shrink?
Posted by: search engine optimization | November 27, 2010 at 09:16 AM
As long as 'google' remains a verb, SEO will not die.
Posted by: Emperor | October 20, 2010 at 02:37 PM
Me too. I think that all these new stuff like Facebook and social media are just part of the ever changing scene that is SEO.
Posted by: SEOP.com | July 19, 2010 at 07:43 PM
Well said, Jason.
Posted by: Steve Hirsch | May 12, 2010 at 12:01 AM
Hello Matt,
I hear a lot about SEO being dead, but I have to disagree with everyone. I think it's bs. I also don't believe social media sites like facebook are an effective marketing medium, and here's why. First off, it's not targeted, sure you can have a fan page, but have you ever purchased something from a business on facebook? I know I haven't. And yes it does connect people, but people that already know you not new business.
If most people are like me, they will get sick of all the FB emails, and post updates, and farmsville junk.
I don't know, I think it's not going to last as it refers to advertising and taking over SEO. Google's entire business revolves around search, I just don't think they will make it irrelevant.
Also, every single post I see that talks about bookmarking and cookies being a way to determine what your search results will be, just doesn't make sense. This assumes that every person online has been here before and has searched that term.
So in my view, as long as Google is here and new people are coming online, I can't see SEO every disappearing. Just my view.
Thanks,
Jason Caruso
Posted by: Jason Caruso | April 29, 2010 at 04:30 AM